Hittite Cult Inventories

JMU Logo

Citatio: M. Cammarosano (ed.), hethiter.net/: CTH 527.45 (INTR 2020-04-16)

Cult inventory

(CTH 527.45)

Textual tradition

A

A1

KUB 12.36

A2

+ KUB 60.9

B

B1

KUB 30.37

Basis of the edition

The present edition is based on the photographs available at the Mainzer Photoarchiv of the Hethitologie Portal Mainz, as well as the available hand-copies and relevant secondary literature up to 2019. When the original manuscripts have been collated, this is noted in the commentary.

Commentary

KUB 12.36 + KUB 60.9

Previous editions: Hazenbos 2003: 142-43.

This tablet is exceptional both because it is written in pre-NS script (van den Hout 1994: 121, Košak 1994: 288) and because it has a duplicate in the late manuscript KUB 30.37. The tablet begins with the deposition of a certain Tarḫini, “man of Tamarmara,” on the cult image and festivals of the god Šulinkatte. Although Tarḫini is native of Tamarmara, the inventory must not necessarily refer to this town; the preserved part of the colophon (KUB 30.37 iv 1′) mentions the Storm god of Nerik. This fact may be the very reason for the recopying of the text, a circumstance with very few parallels in the corpus (see Cammarosano 2013: 93 for a discussion of this case).

Apart from the detailed description of the cult image (obv. 3-9), an element of special interest is the fact that a winter festival (and not as usual an autumn festival) is paired to the spring festival (obv. 10-12). This was interpreted by Hazenbos (2003: 142) as a hint at the “general revision of the local festivals under Tudḫaliyaš IV (and possibly already Ḫattušiliš III),” but in my opinion the text reflects a genuine variant, which is attested in other late cult inventories as well (Cammarosano 2018: 117, 136).

Palaeography and orthography: Clear, non-cursive script with slanted heads of the vertical wedges and deep impressions. Pre-NS, see the signs TAR (l. 1), LI (l. 2, 7), KÙ (l. 3), SAG (l. 8); note however that IT does not present the characteristically MS stepped form (l. 6).

obv. 2: See commentary on KUB 30.37 i 2.

KUB 30.37

Previous editions: Hazenbos 2003: 142-43.

The fragment preserves in the first column a duplicate text of the pre-NS tablet KUB 12.36+ (q.v.). The colophon is partially preserved.

Palaeography and orthography: Clear, non-cursive script with slanted heads of the vertical wedges and deep impressions.

i 2: It is not necessary to restore the verbal form ēšzi at the end of the line (contra Hazenbos 2003: 142), and there is hardy enough space in the gap to accommodate such a restoration.

CC BY-SA 4.0 Michele Cammarosano | Produced as part of the research project Critical edition, digital publication, and systematic analysis of the Hittite cult-inventories (CTH 501-530), funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – project number 298302760, 2016–2020.

☛ Abbreviations, Symbols, and Bibliography

☛ Hittite Local Cults Database


Editio ultima: 2020-04-16






Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional